
What is the episode about?
The Wisecrack episode 'Who's There' focuses on the British stand-up comedian Edd Hedges and the traumatic event that fundamentally changed his life. In this second episode of the series, investigator and host Jodi Tovay delves into the actual circumstances behind the murder that Edd Hedges has processed through his comedy. The story begins in a small, anonymous English village, where a man named Brett broke into Edd Hedges' family home. After killing family members, the perpetrator directly sought out Edd at his residence. The episode follows the moment when Jodi Tovay identifies the crucial name that allows the case to be reopened and confronts the past that Edd has tried to distance himself from through humor for years.
The case behind the episode
The case of Brett and the murder of Edd Hedges' family members is an unusual criminal case that blends personal tragedy with a long-lasting legal investigation. The perpetrator, identified in the podcast as Brett, committed an act of violence that left a deep mark on the small community. The Edd Hedges case differs from many other true crime cases in that the victim has chosen to use the stage as a form of therapy. Jodi Tovay has spent nearly a decade mapping the events, which has involved countless prison visits, reviewing court documents, and interviewing people close to the perpetrator. In this episode, it becomes clear how Edd Hedges struggles to face reality as the investigation progresses and removes the protective layer of comedy he has built around the events.
About the podcast
Wisecrack is produced by Tenderfoot TV in collaboration with Starwipe Productions and is distributed via iHeartPodcasts. The series is unique in its structure, as it combines elements of stand-up comedy with classic investigative journalism. Over six episodes, listeners follow Jodi Tovay, known for her ability to penetrate complex human stories. The podcast not only investigates the crime itself but also the psychological aftermath of trauma and the question of whether everything can and should be made into entertainment. The collaboration between the investigative host and the affected comedian creates a narrative tension that drives the story forward toward an inevitable confrontation with the truth.